Hidden camera update. (three cases involving the use of hidden cameras): An article from: American Journalism Review
 
List Price: $5.95

Our Price: $5.95

You Save:

 

Product Description

This digital document is an article from American Journalism Review, published by University of Maryland on December 1, 1995. The length of the article is 669 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Digital Locker immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.

From the supplier: Three cases involving the use of hidden cameras by journalists show that, while judges are reluctant to issue injunctions barring there use, news organizations run the risk of having to pay damages to the people they tape. ABC News was ordered to pay compensatory and punitive damages to a telephone psychic and attorney's fees to the psychic's lawyer. In another case, the news organization issued an apology in connection with a lawsuit stemming from the recording of an attorney-client interviews, and the suit was dropped. Another case involving business practices was settled out a court and the terms were not disclosed.

Citation Details
Title: Hidden camera update. (three cases involving the use of hidden cameras)
Author: Robert Lissit
Publication: American Journalism Review (Refereed)
Date: December 1, 1995
Publisher: University of Maryland
Volume: v17 Issue: n10 Page: p11(1)

Distributed by Thomson Gale